From a source you read to work you can defend.
Six steps, one loop. The machine proposes at every stage; you decide. Nothing enters your vault — and nothing leaves it as “fact” — without passing your gate.
A source comes in
Paste text, a link or a highlight. Scribe splits it into atomic note drafts — one idea each, encoded for retrieval, not for filing. The original stays attached, one click away.
Drafts, not dogma
Each draft carries its source quote and a proposed claim. Bad extraction is cheap to reject: drafts wait in a review queue, capped so they never flood your attention.
You approve what becomes knowledge
Nothing is written into the vault by a machine alone. You accept, edit or dismiss every draft. This is the moment the note becomes yours — and the reason you can later defend it.
Every claim earns a band
Assayer checks claims against your other sources: solid — you verified it and sources agree; contested — your sources disagree; tentative — one source, unconfirmed. Contradictions surface as angles, not alarms.
Spaced retrieval until you own it
Tutor schedules reviews with FSRS-6 — the ideas move from your database into your head. Connection happens between things you hold, not between files.
Weaver proposes, you compose
Weaver suggests non-obvious bridges between verified notes, each with auditable sub-scores and the cognitive-science methods it rests on. You accept the connection, you write the work. No machine-authored synthesis with your name on it.
And the loop closes
Shipped work traces back to notes; notes trace back to sources; the score that matters — grounded synthesis — counts what you made, with time in the denominator. No streaks, no feed.